ACCA考试辅导:Pilot papers for F4

ACCA/CAT考试辅导:Pilot papers for F4
1
8–10 Good explanation of the two organisations.
5–7 Sound explanation but lacking in detail or perhaps slightly unbalanced.
0–4 Weak explanation or very unbalanced in that the answer only deals with one type.
2
8–10 Good explanation of the grounds and procedure for challenging anarbitrator’s appointment. Reference to the provisions of the Model Lawwill be expected.
5–7 Fair understanding perhaps lacking in detail or reference to the Model Law.
0–4 Very unbalanced answer or lacking any detailed explanation.
3
This question requires candidates to explain the rules relating tothe concept of acceptance under the UN Convention on Contracts for theInternational Sale of Goods.
8–10 Good explanation of the meaning acceptance with reference to the appropriate Articles.
5–7 Fair explanation of the meaning but perhaps lacking in detail or examples.
0–4 Very unbalanced answer or lacking any detailed explanation.
4
This question requires candidates to explain the rules relating tothe preservation of goods under the UN Convention on Contracts for theInternational Sale of Goods.
8–10 Good explanation of rules with reference to the appropriate Articles.
5–7 Fair explanation of the obligations but perhaps lacking in detail or examples.
0–4 Very unbalanced answer or lacking any detailed explanation.
5
8–10 Good to complete answer which shows a knowledge of the meaningand effect of the two types of authority. It is likely that caseauthority will be provided， and they will be rewarded accordingly.
5–7 Fair explanation of the two types of authority but perhaps lacking in detail， or only dealing with two types.
0–4 Some basic knowledge of what is meant by the terms， but no realdepth of understanding. Perhaps an unbalanced answer that only dealswith one part of the question.
6
8–10 A good treatment of all three types of meeting， probably， although not necessarily， with reference to statutory provisions.
5–7 A sound understanding of the area， although perhaps lacking in detail.
2–4 Some understanding of the area， but lacking in detail， perhaps failing to deal with one type of meeting.
0–1 Little or no knowledge of the area.
7
8–10 A good explanation of the meaning of corporate governancegenerally and the roles of the two types of directors in particular.Reference might well be made to the OECD or the Combined Code.
5–7 A sound understanding of the area， although perhaps lacking in detail.
2–4 Some understanding of the area， but lacking in detail， perhapsfailing to deal the relationship of the two group of directors.
0–1 Little or no knowledge of the area.
8
8–10 A good analysis of the scenario with a understanding and application of the law， with detailed reference to the convention.
5–7 Some understanding of the situation but perhaps lacking in detail or reference to the convention.
0–4 Weak answer lacking in knowledge or application， with little or no reference to the convention.
9
8–10 A complete answer， highlighting and dealing with all of theissues presented in the problem scenario. It is most likely that casesand statutory provisions will be referred to， and they will be credited.
5–7 An accurate recognition of the problems inherent in the question，together with an attempt to apply the appropriate legal rules to thesituation.
2–4 An ability to recognise some， although not all， of the key issuesand suggest appropriate legal responses to them. A recognition of thearea of law but no attempt to apply that law.
0–1 Very weak answer showing no， or very little， understanding of the question.
10
8–10 A good analysis of the scenario with a clear explanation of thelaw relating to the insider dealing， with detailed reference tostatutory provisions.
5–7 Some understanding of the situation but perhaps lacking in detail or reference to the statutes.
0–4 Weak answer lacking in knowledge or application， with little or no reference to the statute.